Sunday, September 24, 2006

God Help the Black Scholar with a Looking Glass

For a period of time now I have felt that there exists a serious conflict of interest in relationship to the self dispersal of the "black intellect" within the confines of Euro white ivory towers.

It's hard to extend upon what has already been offered thus far regarding data; that said, I believe it is equally important that we touch on an another aspect that we have overlooked, the HBCU structures and their intended purposes. At the risk of being redundant, I am sure we have entertained these topics at some time or another but for contextual purposes, it is worth mentioning again..

The TWI has a mission strongly reflects a research tone where as the HBCUs embody a liberal arts foundation.. These divergent missions represent perpendicular ideologies. Many big 10 TWI's hold to the iron clad rule of publish or perish-- no publish, no tenure which in essence means no job security. At the other end of the spectrum, the modalities of the HBCUs stipulate that faculty come in, teach, serve on committees, not rock the boat, equating to a possibility (in some circumstances bleak possibility) of tenure. Cobb was 100% accurate when he eluded to the fact the Princetons, the Havards and other ivys are resource heavy which in turn, thus enabling them to create these AA studies “dream teams.” Another individual stated that Hampton and Howard work to cultivate future generations of scholars prepared and willing to pick up the African American scholarship where the current generation leaves off. That post equally has validity/salience --in it short makes sense..

That said, I posed this question to Dyson and West and their reactions as they were different, shared similarities. Having worked and still working at an HBCU I can easily understand their reasoning-- Dyson said, "I can't work for the Negro rate." West stated, "I was in jail this weekend protesting the G8 summit (I think that's what it was). (paraphrasing here) I don't think an HBCU will understand why Professor West was in jail." I am torn because as a supporter, I think I should caveat that, as a progressive supportive of HBCUs, I think the mission resonates for generations to come, as long as white privilege and racism exists. HBCUs have a place in our society… Lets face it, many HBCUs overwork and underpay their chief a large segment of their analytical bank, their faculty. Furthermore, I the philosophical dynamics and acrobatics held by many of these black scholars behind the ivory tower simply is not appreciated within the halls of the current of the HBCU structure. Building upon what T said earlier, many of these thinkers are not only thinking out of the box; they are restructuring the box into a sphere, a public sphere of epistemological discourse.

Egyptology-- as intriguing as it sounds would not have the same home at Shaw University as it would at Georgetown... Hegemonic Masculinity and its Oppositional Masculinities would not survive at NCCU or NCATSU for the simple fact of its content... (we really don't talk of homosexuals within our conversations unless we negate them--something which philosophically I think we need to change).. But even in and of that-- some of us on this list serve are products of that thinking...the HBCU mentality...

Furthermore, I think the conversation in African American Studies is on the verge of a major paradigm shift and or purging... The main focus in academe is on the topic of globalization....Globalization has one main isim and I have said it before-- capitalism.. Capitalism drives a whole host of other isims as I have said before-- Globalization centers primarily on the issue of domination vis-à-vis economic control.. When you have a small group of folk who look like each other, think like each other and others factoids, you have cultural imperialism which in turn "whitewashes" marginalized societies. Dyson, West, Rose, and hooks, and Baker among others are bringing this issue to the forefront. Talks about globalization don't take place at the HBCU-- it almost plays into the muted group theory.. that deals with male privilege and language -- however, I think could be extended white privilege and the control of the epistemological discourse... Men [Dominant society] create the words and meaning for the culture, allowing expression of their ideas. Women [Marginalized society], on the other hand, are left out of this meaning creation and left without a means to express that which is unique to them. That leaves women [Marginalized society] as a muted group.

This in turn could contribute to the spiral of silence that takes place at the HBCU where the still tongue makes a happy life.. There are too many games and inbreeding that takes place at the HBCU which makes the current design desperately in need of retooling and psychiatric evaluation.. Instead of lauding the employee or professor who actively engages in research and critical scholarship, the internal structures of these institutions work to destroy self esteem/efficacy... This can easily be attributed (I think) to a base of insecurity linked to neo-power. See at these institutions of epistemological plantations, there is a façade or false promise of scholarship. Instead there is this grandiose game of "king of the mountain"

or as we know "crabs in the bucket" where everybody strives to be on top by any means necessary. God help the black scholar who attempts to hold a mirrior up to these institutions for he or she will be drummed into academic exile. This is why I have serious contention with the Dysons, Wests, hooks et al. As Dyson pointed out, Martin Luther King Jr. put his body on the line for civil rights and we elegize him. The parallel may be a little off, but the concept remains the same...These folks who have liberated themselves academically, who have insulated themselves in their respective pocketbooks, will not come to the aid of the field Negroes who still sweat blood and tears at the epistemological sweat factories in the dirty south. To me, that represents a conflict..

To make matters worse, West alluded that blacks at the HBCUs could not match the caliber of his white and black students at Princeton-- real or imaginary, simply by making that statement alienates him folk who really need his sprit, his guidance, his presence as opposed to being his financial base....

So in closing-- (sorry to be so long winded) AA studies at the Ivy TWIs I am not too worried about as I am sure as soon as the need dries up, so too will the need for these programs.... What needs to take place a thrusting of the AA studies program into the global dialogue.. Hopefully, the HBCUs will enter a paradigm shift of their own to spear head this initiative....


Tuesday, September 12, 2006

The Invisible Man of the 21st Century

From: Boyce Watkins - Syracuse Finance [mailto:bwatkins@twcny.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 1:18 PM
To: Russell Robinson
Subject: Re: :Seeking thoughts on the brother left out of the 9/11 movie
Damn Dr. Robinson, that was deep and insightful. I learned something today.
I still think MI3 was a good movie though! Outside of that, this was intriguing and outstanding.
Boyce
----- Original Message -----
From: Russell Robinson
To: 'boyce watkins' ; 'BOTA'
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: { SPAM 2 }::Seeking thoughts on the brother left out of the 9/11 movie
As a student of mass media and cultural studies, let me say that in my honest opinion (educated opinion that is) this blunder, to put it mildly, is a clear cut example of cultural Marxism. We as African Americans have systematically failed to be active participants in the ownership of a large block of the historical cultural capital within this country’s pop iconography. In short, we have many more folk now getting a chance to spit on the mike and very few people who own the microphone factory. It is this re-presentation that Stuart Hall speaks of. Extending on this, many of us on this list serve have a basic knowledge of hegemony, the means of class domination vis-à-vis the mass production, now nonlinear, exponential reproduction of cultural texts. As a critic of popular culture, I find it hard incredibly hard to believe that this erasure from American history and 21st century American popular culture was an accident. In all sincerity I strongly feel—this was by design by way of the corporate elites who own the image making factories who incidentally are not interested in spreading fact but more interested in reaping high profits. Lastly, as I begin to defer, I think this brother’s omission from the screen calls for a serious inquiry into the definition of American and its relationship to the caste system that is fused to color and economics within our society. When the term American is used by the dominant Other, 10 times out of 10, the definition concentrates on white Americans primarily, the model minorities second, the dark people of color third and of course, the economically, socially, disenfranchised underclass at the deep bottom. As America is unequivocally in need of heroes, there is this unwritten caveat that the hero must fit the hegemonic ideal. If we really think about it, why did Paramount drop their deal with Tom Cruise—(allow me to make this point because I think it’s legit)? His masculinity has come under serious fire. In addition, his association with certain black folk may be undermining his white boy street credit. Isn’t it interesting that after allowing Kanye West a slot on the MI3 soundtrack, his popularity slowly stated to slip even further? Watching MI3, (it was a challenge cause the movie seriously was sorry) the franchise has now begun to enter into a serious sense of cultural consciousness at least as far as black folk are concerned. Ask yourself, has there ever been a reference to Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man in a mainstream “block buster” motion picture? Never…. That said, this omission is hardly an accident. I see it as a well orchestrated example of the racialized social contract being reinforced.
Russell

From: owner-bota@listserv2.duc.auburn.edu [mailto:owner-bota@listserv2.duc.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of boyce watkins
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 4:58 PM
To: BOTA
Subject: { SPAM 2 }::Seeking thoughts on the brother left out of the 9/11 movie
Hey brothers,
I wanted to know how everyone felt about the brother being left out of the 9/11 movie. They did a USA Today and CNN story on it recently, where a black man played a key role in saving others, and he was portrayed in the World Trade Center movie as a white man. I talked to his family, and they didn't seem so happy about it. I also got an email from the Producer, Michael Shamberg, who stated that it was a genuine mistake. I thought maybe he was writing to sue me or cuss me out, but he went through great pains to explain in a 2 page email (sent twice after he made revisions) why the mistake occured, and what he is doing to correct it. He also made some correct assertions about the piss poor journalism of Black America Web, who incorrectly stated that Thomas' character was being played by Nicolas Cage, and that there were two black men being misportrayed (there was only one). I am angry at Black America Web for this, and they really need to learn this new journalism term called "fact checker".
I communicated to him that while I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt, there are still serious concerns. For example, when spending hundreds of hours in preproduction and telling very detailed stories that are going to be portrayed in the highly visible nature of filmmaking, it would seem that SOMEONE at SOMEPOINT would say "Was he a black guy, a white guy, or what?" If the conversation happened and it was ignored, then that's a problem. If it didn't happen, then that's also a problem.
I was asked by the family of the Seargant to write his autobiography actually, but I am not sure if I want to do that. I personally feel that my irritation that someone dropped the ball on this matter might deflect from the fact that this brother is an American hero. There are times when I need to leave my "militancy" to myself. At the same time, I invited Shamberg to be a part of the ceremony to recognize this brother in public for his contribution to this country. In case you don't know, he arrived to the site AFTER THE SECOND TOWER HAD FALLEN, and still got out of his car. This dude is something else.
Hillary Clinton is coming to Syracuse in the near future and I have stated that as a condition of my supporting her desire to get votes in Syracuse, she needs to take this opportunity to do what the rest of New York has failed to do: recognize this brother for his contribution. I also feel that being a part of an organization with black male intellectuals, we should all be kept up on what is going on.
I realized that I have my own thoughts on the matter, but I am always interested in being the student, not just the teacher. I wanted to hear what others thought about this situation, and whether my outrage is shared by other black men.
Take care brothers, I am back in the US now, it's kind of strange to hear English again!
Boyce